F-15 EX Fighter Jets are set to enter the race for the Indian MMRCA contract. The American F-15 EX fighter aircraft will compete against the French Rafales, Russian SU-35s, American F/A 18 Super Hornets & F-21s besides the Swedish Gripen.
As EurAsian Times reported earlier, the F-15 EX made a comeback after the US Air Force (USAF) placed an order for eight which could go up to 72, will join the F/A 18 Super Hornet and the F 21 (a variant of the F 16) that are already on offer.
Besides the French jets, American and Russian jets are head to head once again for the lucrative Indian defense tender. The two high-end heavyweight aircraft F-15EX and Su-35 represent the modernization of the cold war era aircraft. So how does the Su-35 compete against the F-15EX fighter aircraft?
Indian Media Wakes-Up After 30 Years To Cover Kashmiri Pandit Genocide
What is MMRCA tender?
Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender falls under India’s Make-in-India initiative under which the country pursues to jointly manufacture 114 fighter aircraft and assist its Air Force expansion plans.
F-15EX and Su-35 are both in the contest for India’s MMRCA tender. While the MMRCA initially stated that aircraft should be of a light to medium weight, the Su-35 and F-15X stand out as the only two high-end heavyweight aircraft in the race, keeping the French Rafales out from the picture for now.
Su-35 vs F-15EX Jets
Both the F-15EX and the Su-35 are twin-engine designs capable of functioning at high altitudes, and both have the long ranges needed to penetrate enemy airspace and deliver a wide range of munitions for both air to air and air to ground missions.
The F-15EX certainly does have the advantage of higher speed as it can reach up to the speeds of Mach 2.5 while the Su-35 is restricted to speeds of around Mach 2.25. Both field radars which are similarly sophisticated – the Irbis-E and AN/APG-82 – although the Su-35’s radar is larger and believed to be more powerful.
The Irbis-E can identify most fighter-sized targets at ranges of over 400 kilometers and can track up to 30 airborne targets concurrently and engage up to eight. Stealth fighters with lower radar cross-sections can reportedly be detected at ranges of over 80km.
The Su-35 does benefit from a number of advantages including beyond visual range engagements, including its radar cross-section reducing profile which leaves its radar cross-section at under one-third that of the F-15.
Whereas the Su-35 is a lot stealthier than the original Su-27 – the F-15 has seen little change to its profile. Plans to similarly reduce the radar cross-section of the F-15 under the F-15SE program were canceled, and have not been incorporated into the F-15EX design.
Other advantages enjoyed by the Su-35 include its access to R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missiles – which have a long 400km range, high maneuverability, a Mach 6 speed and very powerful sensors.
American F-15s today rely on the aging AIM-120C with a 105km range – although the F-15EX could be marketed with the AIM-120D with a longer 180km range. These missiles have less than half the range of the R-37 and are much slower – with a speed of around Mach 4.5.
The Su-35 will in the near future also have access to the K-77, which will make use of a revolutionary new APAA guidance system that will make it extremely difficult to evade. The missile will have a range of approximately 200km.
While the F-15EX’s air to air missiles does suffer a quantitative disadvantage, the fighter is able to carry up to 22 of them where the Su-35 can carry just 14. The F-15’s engine thrust is considerably lower than that of the Su-35 however, which if combined with such a heavy weapons payload will seriously compromise maneuverability at all ranges and the fighter’s ability to evade missile attacks.
In visual range combat, the Su-35’s advantages are even more evident. The F-15EX has a much bulkier design with a much lower thrust/weight ratio, allowing the Su-35 to easily outmaneuver it even without relying on its thrust-vectoring engines. Three-dimensional thrust vectoring capabilities, however, will make the Su-35’s advantage bewildering at short ranges.
While the Su-35 appears to be the more capable aircraft based on an assessment of its capabilities, its main attraction to India over the F-15EX is likely to be its compatibility with existing jets in the Indian Air Force’s fleet.
The Su-35 is closely related to the Su-30MKI and the Indian Air Force already operates over 250 and interoperability will provide a significant advantage that the F-15EX would lack.
Alongside the Su-30, India deploys a number of other Russian jets such as the MiG-29 and MiG-21Bisons which use modern Russian munitions such as the R-77 and R-27 air-to-air missiles – all of which are compatible with the Su-35.
Indian Para SF vs Pakistani SSG Commandos – Whom Would You Bet-On In A Rescue Operation?
The similarities between the Su-35 and the Su-30MKI will also allow pilots to relatively easily transfer between operating the two classes – which with India already having several hundred trained Su-30 pilots is a major advantage.
By contrast, integrating the F-15EX into an already very diverse fleet – some would argue too diverse – could provide a logistics nightmare – particularly considering that India deploys no classes of American fighters and no American air-to-air missiles or maintenance equipment.
Further increasing the attractiveness of the Su-35, the fighter has been offered for license manufacturing in India alongside transfers of some technologies for its AL-41 engines and Irbis-E radars. A license manufacturing deal is reportedly being tied to a deal to modernize the Su-30MKI to a ‘4++ generation standard’ – allowing the Indian Air Force to upgrade existing fighters with Irbis-E radars and AL-41 engines which would revolutionize their performances.
This would also allow the older fighters to make use of new types of munitions such as the R-37M air-to-air missile. While the F-15EX is a very formidable fighter, it cannot be paired with an upgrade package for existing Indian fighters in any comparable way – which would only be possible if India already operated older classes of American fighters such as the F-15C.
Eventually, it remains uncertain whether India will opt for a heavyweight fighter under the MMRCA contract or whether it will stick to its original plan to acquire a lighter and lower maintenance jet such as the MiG-35 or French Rafale.
While both the F-15EX and the Su-35 are somewhat similar, the Su-35’s advantages, especially in close range engagement, is noteworthy. The Su-35s primary advantage over the F-15EX, however, is the difficulty of incorporating American aircraft into a service that already operates an overly diverse fleet and does not operate any classes of American fighters or air-to-air missiles.
This advantage is further cemented by the Su-35s very high level of interoperability with the Su-30MKIs, and the possibility of using Su-35 technologies obtained under the contract to upgrade the Su-30 to a comparable ‘4++ generation’ standard.
Operation Polo: Why Merger of Hyderabad Into India Was Called Operation Polo?
Washington has applied immense political pressure including threats of economic sanctions on the country to stay away from Russian hardware.
While the advantages of the Su-35 jets are overwhelming, opting for the American F-15Ex or other fighter jets including the F-21 or the F-18 Super Hornets as part of a politically motivated purchase remains a considerable possibility.
