Home EurAsian Region

‘Break In India’: Navy To Lease Another Nuclear-Powered Submarine From Russia Instead Of Developing One

The Indian Navy’s history of leasing a nuclear submarine from Russia (erstwhile Soviet Union) seems to be repeating itself. India has rented yet another Akula class submarine — dubbed Chakra III — in a $3 billion contract, as Chakra-II has been prematurely returned to Russia due to maintenance issues.

Why China’s New Refueler Y-20 Sends Ominous Signals To India & Others In The Indo-Pacific?

The precedent of subs for rent was set during the fag end of the Cold War when the Indian Navy had received INS Chakra on loan from the USSR after signing a lease in July 1987.

This was the first time a nation had leased out a nuclear submarine. New Delhi and Moscow had chalked out a lease agreement, which allowed the Indian Navy to rent a Charlie-class nuclear cruise missile submarine for a decade.

Interestingly, the Charlie class was not New Delhi’s first choice. Joseph P Chacko, a defense analyst, wrote in Frontier India.

“India was interested in Project 671 or Victor-class submarines with tube-launched anti-ship and land-attack missiles but settled for the Charlie class after the visit to older K-43.

“The K-43 was a compact submarine armed with underwater launched ‘Amethyst’ cruise missile and was capable of attack with self-generated target data making it a potent Aircraft Carrier killer.

The K-43 was then sent to the Zvezda submarine repair yard for modernization and transfer to the Indian Navy.”



INS-Chakra-II
Indian Navy’s INS Chakra II nuclear-powered submarine in the Singapore Strait, en route to Vladivostok, Russia, in June 2021. (via Twitter)


The article went on to chronicle Soviet submariner Alexander Ivavovich Tereno’s experiences while onboard INS Chakra as he narrated “many incidents of submarine malfunction.

The outboard pipes and equipment corroded fast due to the high air temperature, humidity, and salinity. The main suction line was not renewed during the last refit in the Soviet Union which caused flooding and fire. A major emergency at sea was experienced and it took months to repair the submarine.

France Likely To Partner India In Developing Six Nuclear-Powered Attack Submarines – Analysis



“Other issues included poor documentation, false data, and poor discipline in the supply of spares from the Soviet Union. In one instance, the Indian Navy refused to take supplies of the batteries due to their poor condition. The batteries had to be set right in India itself.”

Tereno was summoned to Moscow in 1990, at the end of the third year of the lease, and was told to let Indians know that there was not going to be an extension of the lease. On December 17, the submarine set sail and reached Vladivostok on January 5.

Once in Russia, the submarine was sent to Kamchatka for decommissioning. “During its operational life, the submarine had traveled 72,000 miles, the main power plant had operated for 430 days, fired five missiles and 42 torpedoes,” wrote Chacko.

Indian Navy Veteran Clears The Air

Commodore Arun Kumar (Retd), who was with the first INS Chakra from training to return to Russia, has a different view from the one presented by National Interest, which says,–

“In the latest instance of long-standing military cooperation between Moscow and New Delhi, India is set to rent additional Russian nuclear-powered attack submarines as a stepping stone on its path to acquiring an indigenous nuclear submarine force.”




INS Chakra

Commodore Kumar, whose book, S71 INS Chakra – The Pioneer and her Men will be released in September 2021, told The Eurasian Times, 

Firstly, the sale of nuclear-powered submarines is not possible under the existing international control regimes. Even the Royal Navy could not get one from its cousin across the Atlantic.

T-14 Armata: Russia To Induct Its ‘Most-Capable’ Tanks By Year-End; Eyes Potential Customers In Asia, M. East

Secondly, the Chakra I, a Charlie I class boat, was an SSGN and did not have any nuclear missiles. The boat was completely manned and operated by the Indian crew and there were no restrictions on access to any compartment or weapon load. There were a few Soviet specialists on board only because the boat was on the lease.

Their number never exceeded seven during sea sorties. The contract for it was signed in 1987 and not 1986 [as claimed by National Interest.”

The veteran submariner went on to say, “The transfer took place on January 5, 1988. The Indian design team had full access to the boat, while it was in India, and there were no differences between the Indian and Soviet sides on this score.

Access control was totally under the command of the Indian Navy. The lease itself was planned for three years as it was envisaged that the indigenous program which was in a progressive stage would step in before the lease ended. 

Read More

Exit mobile version