A fuel tank reportedly fell from a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) fighter jet during a routine flight over Chak 100, a rural area of Sargodha, Punjab, reported BBC.
According to police officials, three fighter jets were flying over the area when a fuel tank detached and crashed to the ground. Sargodha, home to a major PAF airbase, regularly witnesses fighter jet activity.
Locals claim the tank caused significant damage, with one resident stating, “Look, there is nothing left of this buffalo, but thankfully the man is safe.”
The report said that a video allegedly depicting the aftermath of the incident has been circulating on social media in Pakistan. The footage shows several buffaloes tied in an enclosure, with a dead buffalo visible and oil spread across the area.
SHO Ejaz Ahmed of Karana police station confirmed the incident, stating that police received a report from their control room and arrived at the scene to assess the situation.
“When we reached there, we saw an iron fuel tank lying on the ground with oil spread everywhere. Our primary concern was preventing a fire hazard,” he said.
He further confirmed that while one buffalo died due to the impact, some other animals suffered minor injuries. Shortly after the incident, personnel from the Pakistan Air Force arrived at the site, secured the fuel tank, and took it away.
Although the recent incident in Sargodha may raise fresh concerns about the safety of training flights conducted over civilian areas, the detachment of fuel tanks from fighter jets is not an entirely unheard-of event.
While these incidents do not happen frequently, they usually occur under specific operational conditions, either as a precautionary measure or due to technical malfunctions.
A similar incident occurred in April 2023 when a Pakistan Air Force fighter jet jettisoned its fuel tank over the mountainous region of Sayyab on Rawalpindi Road. The sudden drop produced a loud explosion, startling residents and causing widespread panic in the area.
Unfortunately, some previous cases have had deadly consequences. In 1997, a PAF fighter jet jettisoned its fuel tanks over a residential area in Karachi, sparking a fire that claimed six lives and left five others injured.
History Of Drop Tanks
If you observe classic fighter and attack aircraft, you may sometimes notice long, cigar-shaped pods securely attached beneath their fuselages or wings.
These are known as “drop tanks,” external fuel tanks designed to extend an aircraft’s operational range by carrying additional fuel. Some of these tanks also feature unit markings, making them easily identifiable.
The development of drop tanks dates back to the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), where they were first introduced to allow fighter aircraft to undertake long-range escort missions without requiring larger, heavier, and less maneuverable airframes.
Moreover, the Mitsubishi A5M, designed by Jiro Horikoshi, was among the earliest aircraft to use an external drop tank in 1937 to increase its flight endurance. By 1940, Germany’s Luftwaffe had also incorporated external fuel tanks, introducing a 300-liter light alloy model for the Ju 87R, a long-range version of the Stuka dive bomber.
Recognizing the strategic advantage of these tanks, the Allies and the Royal Air Force (RAF) soon developed their own versions to extend the range of fighter patrols and long-range bombers.
However, some early critics doubted the effectiveness of long-range escort fighters, believing that pilots would abandon their drop tanks prematurely at the start of a mission, limiting their endurance and making them less viable compared to long-range medium bombers.
However, these concerns were put to rest when the importance of drop tanks became undeniable. A key example was Operation Vengeance, the mission that led to the downing of Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto’s aircraft.
The success of this operation hinged on the additional 450 gallons of fuel provided by drop tanks attached to several Lockheed P-38 Lightning fighters.
Toward the later stages of World War II, material shortages forced military engineers to innovate. With metal in high demand for other wartime priorities, Allied forces began producing disposable drop tanks from specialized glue and kraft paper.
Despite their seemingly fragile construction, these tanks were waterproof and resistant to extreme temperatures. Though they could only be used once, they proved to be both highly effective and resource-efficient.
Interestingly, while metal drop tanks were typically painted dull gray, these lightweight paper tanks were given a bright silver coating and were light enough for a single person to carry when empty.
American Pilots Turned Drop Tanks Into Deadly Weapons
During World War II, American fighter pilots took an unconventional approach to aerial warfare, transforming external fuel tanks into makeshift bombs.
Though rare, some Republic P-47 Thunderbolt pilots showed remarkable ingenuity by switching their fuel source from external to internal tanks while flying low over enemy positions.
With precise timing, they would jettison the drop tanks—still containing fuel—before pulling up and circling back to fire at them. If hit correctly, the tanks would erupt in flames, creating devastating firebombs.
This impromptu tactic was not always successful, particularly as disposable paper drop tanks became more common later in the war. Unlike their metal predecessors, these lightweight tanks were less likely to ignite when struck by gunfire.
To compensate, pilots began modifying their approach, filling the tanks with a volatile fuel mixture to create rudimentary napalm bombs. These drop tanks would detonate on impact without needing to be shot midair.
By the onset of the Korean War, the newly established US Air Force had fully integrated this method into its combat strategy. Drop tanks filled with napalm became a key weapon for low-level close air support missions, which delivered intense firepower against enemy positions.
This controversial practice drew criticism, including from British statesman Winston Churchill, who condemned the use of napalm as excessively cruel and warned of its potential for indiscriminate destruction and civilian casualties.
Napalm’s role in warfare expanded significantly during the Vietnam War, but by then, factories had begun producing specialized bombs designed specifically to carry and deploy napalm, making modified drop tanks largely obsolete.
Today, the US military has all but eliminated napalm from its arsenal. Interestingly, the remnants of past conflicts continue to serve a different purpose.
Since the end of the Vietnam War, resourceful Vietnamese civilians have repurposed abandoned US military equipment in creative ways.
Old aluminum drop tanks, once used as improvised weapons, have found a second life as canoes. The tanks’ lightweight yet durable material made them ideal for waterproof riverboats, which became an essential mode of transportation for farmers and villagers navigating Vietnam’s vast network of rivers.
Why Do Fighter Jets Drop Their Fuel Tanks?
While the sight of a fuel tank detaching from an aircraft may seem alarming to some, it is a well-established practice in military aviation. Under specific circumstances, pilots may need to jettison these tanks to ensure the safety of both the aircraft and themselves.
External fuel tanks are attached to fighter jets to extend their operational range. While they offer additional fuel capacity, they also add considerable weight to the aircraft and reduce its speed and maneuverability.
In situations where an aircraft encounters technical issues, pilots may decide to discard the tanks to lighten the aircraft’s load. This improves the jet’s handling, conserves fuel, and increases the chances of reaching the nearest airbase safely.
However, jettisoning a fuel tank is not a routine action and is only carried out when absolutely necessary. Pilots are trained to assess all possible alternatives before making this decision.
If the aircraft’s situation becomes critical to the point where an emergency ejection is required, dropping the fuel tank becomes irrelevant, as the pilot will have to abandon the jet entirely.
To prevent harm to civilians, strict aviation regulations dictate where these tanks can be released. Pilots are instructed to drop them in unpopulated areas, such as deserts, seas, or remote landscapes, where the risk of casualties or property damage is minimal.
These locations are predetermined, and pilots have access to detailed information regarding designated drop zones. The decision to release a fuel tank is made only after all possible options have been evaluated, ensuring that it remains a controlled and carefully considered action.
- Contact the author at ashishmichel(at)gmail.com
- Follow EurAsian Times on Google News
